Output

Output & related work

Here you will find output from the project as well as related prior work from team members.

OUTPUT

Mackor (2024). De rechterlijke bewijsoordeelsvorming (episode 5 of the podcast ‘De Stand van het Onderzoek naar de Rechtspraak’). [Spotify]

Jellema & Mackor (2024). Misverstanden rond falsificatie en alternatieve scenario’s.

Dahlman (2023). A systematic account of probabilistic fallacies in legal fact-finding

Mackor (2023). The plausible, the possible and the probable

RELATED WORK

Mackor (2024) Risks of Incorrect Use of Probabilities in Court and What to Do about Them

Liden (2023). Confirmation Bias in Criminal Cases.

Jellema (2023). (Im)probable stories.

Strittmatter (2023). Do people prefer prediction over accommodation? An empirical study

Dahlman, Stein & Tuzet (eds.) (2021). Philosophical Foundations of Evidence Law

• Ch. 15 – Mackor & van Koppen – The scenario theory about evidence in criminal law
• Ch. 18 Fenton & Lagnado – Bayesianism: objections and rebuttals
• Ch. 19 Dahlman & Kolflaath – The problem of the prior in criminal trials

Lagnado (2021). Explaining the Evidence: How the Mind Investigates the World

Mackor, Jellema & van Koppen (2021). Explanation-Based Approaches to Reasoning about Evidence and Proof in Criminal Trials

Prakken, Bex & Mackor (2020). Special Issue Topics in Cognitive Science: Models of Rational Proof in Criminal Law

• Dahlman – De-Biasing Legal Fact-Finders With Bayesian Thinking.
• Fenton, Neil, Yet & Lagnado – Analyzing the Simonshaven Case Using Bayesian Networks
• van Koppen & Mackor – A Scenario Approach to the Simonshaven Case